Fwd: Re: [jbpm-users] local history for the jbpm web editor
by Tihomir Surdilovic
Forwarding to jbpm-dev list as users list is not being monitored.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [jbpm-users] local history for the jbpm web editor
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:23:34 -0400
From: Tihomir Surdilovic <tsurdilo(a)redhat.com>
To: Gábor Farkas <gabor.farkas(a)doctusoft.com>
CC: jbpm-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Hi Gabor - that looks impressive and useful for the community. I'd be
happy to work with you to incorporate this functionality into the
Designer codebase and promote you as community contributor for jBPM.
Let's chat on IRC (#jbpm or #jbpmdev on irc.freenode.net).
Tihomir
On 10/3/12 10:42 AM, Gábor Farkas wrote:
> Hello,
> We've created a prototype for a local history functionality for the
> jbpm-designer, we needed it for multiple reasons. It stores data in
> the browser localStorage, so it also serves a bit like 'undo after
> save'. It checks the json representation of the process every minute
> and if it differs, it creates a new local history entry, including a
> thumbnailed screenshot. It's available after browser restart too, so
> if you accidentally close the browser, you can still restore your work.
> Here's a small screenshot.
> https://docs.google.com/open?id=0Bxw7L2kmpno8RkJUY3Zjd0I4Mlk
>
> Needs quite much elaboration, but it's already functional and useful
> for our needs.
> If you find it interesting, we'd be happy to share it with the community.
>
> regards,
> Gabor Farkas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbpm-users mailing list
> jbpm-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-users
11 years, 5 months
5.4.0.CR1
by Michael Anstis
Hi,
I have deployed jBPM 5.4.0.CR1 to Nexus.
Could you please update JBPM's JIRA as required.
As with 5.4.0.Beta1 I have not done anything with jbpm-form-builder or
jbpm-designer as you wanted to handle them internally.
With kind regards,
Mike
11 years, 6 months
Re: [jbpm-dev] Jenkins Jobs
by Tihomir Surdilovic
On 10/18/12 11:34 AM, Kris Verlaenen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Michael Anstis
> <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com <mailto:michael.anstis@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> dpalmer (#jbosssoa) was asking whether Jenkins jobs are needed for
> the following (for jBPM 5.4.x):-
>
> * jbpm-designer
>
> Tiho, you'll probably have to create a jbpm-designer-2.4.x job and
> also update designer master to 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT
We set up a job for Designer when it was ported to the droolsjbpm repo.
>
> * jbpm-persistence-db-matrix
>
> As Marco said, no.
>
> * jbpmmigration
>
> No, it's currently not released as part of jBPM and has a separate
> versioning.
>
> Kris
11 years, 6 months
Jenkins Jobs
by Michael Anstis
Hi,
dpalmer (#jbosssoa) was asking whether Jenkins jobs are needed for the
following (for jBPM 5.4.x):-
- jbpm-designer
- jbpm-persistence-db-matrix
- jbpmmigration
Please advise.
Cheers,
Mike
11 years, 6 months
Drools and jBPM 5.5.x branches have been created
by Michael Anstis
Hi,
Just a note to you all to advise that the 5.5.x branches have been made on
github and Jenkins jobs setup accordingly.
Should you make changes to master that are needed for 5.5.x please be sure
to cherry-pick...
There are a couple of remaining tasks:-
- jBPM Form Builder - Needs branching and POM's updated.
- jBPM Designer - Needs branching, POM's updated and Jenkins job
https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/view/Drools%20jBPM/job/g...
to build jBPM Designer 5.5.x.
- jBPM contains properties overriding the Drools version in
droolsjbpm-parent POM. I suspect these need changing in master to point to
6.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
The jBPM Team wanted to handle these changes for 5.5.0.Beta1 so I have
assumed the same for the branch.
With kind regards,
Mike
11 years, 6 months
Re: [jbpm-dev] [rules-dev] POM changes for AS7.1.2 BOM
by Michael Anstis
Does anybody know of any incompatibilities between 7.1.1 and 7.1.2?
We had various issues between 7.0.2 and 7.1.1. It would be awkward to have
poms changed to target a BOM we can't launch (the community edition)
against if they are not 100% compatible.
Assuming they are compatible we have to assume we have to target AS7.1.1
(at minimum) and any issues encountered with 7.0.2 have to be banished to
history.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 3 October 2012 14:52, Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Michael Anstis píše v St 03. 10. 2012 v 13:38 +0100:
> > We have had numerous cross-compatibility issues in the past with 7.0.2
> > and 7.1.1 and trying for 7.0.2, 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 could be quite
> > difficult.
>
> As far as I know, 7.1.2 is only available as a Git tag. No public
> release was ever made. For people who want to use it, they can either
> build it themselves or obtain a copy of EAP 6 (which is a commercially
> supported offering of Red Hat).
>
> --
> Lukáš Petrovický
> QE Lead, JBoss Enterprise BRMS
> Phone: +420 532 294 123
> irc: lpetrovi, triceo
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
11 years, 6 months
POM changes for AS7.1.2 BOM
by Michael Anstis
Hello,
FYI, dpalmer has been recently submitting PRs (and later pushing direct) to
move our POMs to mirror the AS7.1.2 BOM.
This being news to me I thought it advisable to inform that those of us
needing to test with AS should probably target the same; i.e. 7.1.2.
We have had numerous cross-compatibility issues in the past with 7.0.2 and
7.1.1 and trying for 7.0.2, 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 could be quite difficult.
Personally, it'd have been nice if somebody told us of the impending risk
before the pom changes were made. Fortunately I had already taken a local
copy of github for 5.5.0.Beta1.
Perhaps there was a lack of communication somewhere? IDK.
Cheers,
Mike
11 years, 6 months