Re: [jbpm-dev] jBPM5 Request for Comments - feedback
Hello Diego,
Am 17.04.2010 21:14, schrieb Diego López León:
Hi Sebastian,
I think it's already possible to use Drools Flow as "stateless"
process engine, but the API is not oriented on this concept so it may
be a little tricky if this is your first approach to the world of
Drools.
In conlusion, your needs are already fit with the current state of the project.
It might be that you misunderstood me a bit. I was not formulating
requirements. Actually I was just giving an example why it definetely
makes sense to keep Drools and jBPM in a way the can be used separately.
I was also trying to dinstinguish use cases for Drools and jBPM.
I agreed that there is the need to offer an integrated solution but
modularity and a small footprint are top priorities for me.
Best regards
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Schneider
e-mail: Sebastian.Schneider(a)alumni.fh-aachen.de