@Thomas: I also the events I want to listen for are more inside of the engine (so
implementation detail ;-)). But the Listeners you propose also make sense, even if I
don't understand the API at this part yet...
@Tom: I expected you to say that ;-) And I agree with you, but for me the situation is not
putting effort in jbpm 3 or 4, but to solve the problem in the customer project either by
some workarounds around jbpm (in "our" code) or to implement it correctly in the
jbpm 3 core. Effort could be maybe the same. So I think it makes more sense to contribute
it to jbpm and maybe even gather experiences for jbpm 4. And even jbpm 3 will be around
for quite a while I think...
So if you don't vote explicitly against it I would maybe contribute it if it comes to
that point in the current project (concept isn't yet fixed), ok?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190987#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...