Relaying Matthias - he wants an AND. For reasons of resource-handling,
we will need the prefix-mapping anyways.
regards,
Martin
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matthias Wessendorf <matthias.wessendorf(a)oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:50:09 +0100
Subject: Re: [jsr-314-open] FacesServlet declaration in Java EE 6
To: jsr-314-open(a)jcp.org, dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com,
mmarinschek(a)apache.org, pmuir(a)redhat.com, andy.schwartz(a)oracle.com
Hello friends and /dev/null ...
I'd like to see a sentence like that, however I prefer that /faces/* is
present as well.
So it should be IMO an "and" ...
-Matthias
Martin Marinschek wrote:
+1 as well!
regards,
Martin
On 11/5/09, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> "If the JSF container is used in a Servlet 3 (or newer) environment, it
>> should register an implementation of ServletContainerInitializer (using
>> Service Providers from the JAR file specification). The
>> ServletContainerInitializer should register the FacesServlet, with a name
>> of
>> Faces Servlet, if an existing servlet is not yet registered with this
>> name.
>> Furthermore, a suffix mapping of *.jsf [and/or a prefix mapping of
>> /faces/*]
>> should be added."
>>
>>
> Well said. +1 from me.
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
>
http://mojavelinux.com
>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces