Re: [jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>
Could someone please file this as a spec RFE?
We'll have to do a performance test to really see the implications, but
it does seem like it would be useful to have this.
Jim
On 12/15/09 12:04 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
I'd even like to see it add <head> if not provided. Would
that be too
overreaching?
Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.
> On Dec 15, 2009 1:02 PM, "David Geary" <clarity.training(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> 2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>>
>
> > > It would be nice if it "just worked", and jsf would
automatically
> add/detect he right place to l...
>
> +1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as necessary to coordinate with
> resource relocation from h:outputScript and h:outputStylesheet, but it
> would be great if you could just use <head> and <body> instead, and
> have everything work.
>
>
> david
>
> > > Lincoln Baxter III > http://ocpsoft.com > http://scrumshark.com >
> Keep it simple. >> >> On Dec 1...
>
>