Personally, I don't think there's anything wrong with having a signature
that requires an event listener. Isn't that how most UI toolkits work? What
about Swing or SWT?
I do understand the desire to have some code completely decoupled, though.
If we make the signature optional, though, I'm afraid that'll be even more
confusing for users.
---
Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. |
http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter:
jsfcentral
+1 203-404-4848 x3
Sign up for the JSFCentral newsletter:
http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It would be nice if jsf made all these event signatures optional.
I know its a stumbling block for many users.
Perhaps the ability to inject those parameters with an annotation (or
access via facesContext.getCurrentSystemEvent() ... obviously just a short
winded concept. But the idea is to somehow provide optional access.)
Lincoln Baxter's Droid
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.
On Jan 21, 2010 10:19 PM, "Cay Horstmann" <cay(a)horstmann.com> wrote:
Consulting the specification for f:event (
http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/2.0/docs/pdldocs/facelets/f/ev...),
I find that the signature is required to match public void
listener(javax.faces.event.ComponentSystemEvent event) throws
javax.faces.event.AbortProcessingException.
That's actually too bad. When I do a preRenderView event with viewParams, I
don't need the CSE parameter, and I'd rather not couple my managed bean with
the JSF API. So, it sure would be nice if I had the flexibility of using the
signature public void listener() instead. Mojarra actually lets me do that!
I am asking here and not in the Mojarra forum because I am hoping that the
f:event spec isn't accurate--it has other issues (
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=586,
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=639,
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=712
)
Did you discuss this before? Does Mojarra implement what was intended?
Thanks,
Cay
--
Cay S. Horstmann |
http://horstmann.com | mailto:cay@horstmann.com