I like the idea, but I'm wondering if we can still retain the URN
format. Perhaps something like one of the following:
urn:components/util
Any other ideas are welcome.
One thing to keep in mind that we are still hoping to be able to merge
composite components with Java-based component libraries. So this
would be a shorthand that would strictly be for sets of components
which are composite only. To merge, you would have to switch to a
formal URL syntax.
-Dan
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1, +1
Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.
On Dec 7, 2009 3:08 PM, "David Geary" <clarity.training(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Ok, sure. That sounds even better.
david
2009/12/7 Kito Mann <kito.mann(a)virtua.com>
> > +1 > > I say we add it to the issue tracker for a the maintenance
> > release (_not_ 2.1). > --- > ...
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen