Re: [jsr-314-open] [JSF 2.1 NEW] composite component namespace simplification

Heck, while we are here, why don't we just do: xmlns:f="jsf:core" xmlns:h="jsf:html" xmlns:ui="jsf:ui" I'm trying to think if there are problems with doing that, but we can associate the schema with these shorter names. The real benefit of using a full-blown URI is that you can avoid conflicts w/ other namespace providers. But since we are JSF (there can be only one JSF, evil laugh) then why not? -Dan -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen