Ok, sure. That sounds even better.
david
2009/12/7 Kito Mann <kito.mann(a)virtua.com>
+1
I say we add it to the issue tracker for a the maintenance release (_not_
2.1).
---
Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. |
http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info |
twitter: jsfcentral
+1 203-404-4848 x3
JSF Summit Conference Dec 1st-4th in Orlando:
http://www.jsfsummit.com
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:01 PM, David Geary <clarity.training(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> I hope I'm following the new convention for posts--if not, anyone is free
to
> yell at me. Anyway, this came up at JSF Summit:
>
> Right now, page authors do something like this...
>
>
xmlns:util="http://java.sun.com/jsf/composite/components/util"
>
> ...to access composite components in resources/components/util. I'd like
to
> propose that we allow page authors to simply do this instead:
>
> xmlns:util="components/util"
>
> It's much simpler, and is almost exactly what page authors do in Flex. In
> many other respects, btw, implementing components in Flex is very similar
to
> what we now do in JSF 2.0.
>
>
> david
>
>
>