Sure, +1. And more importantly, welcome to 314 Lincoln! Better late
than never I guess. :-)
Andy
lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com wrote:
+ 1
:)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:00:52
To: <jsr-314-open(a)jcp.org>
Subject: Re: Request for Changes to 2.0 Final Artifact
+ 1
On 23 Jun 2009, at 22:52, Roger Kitain wrote:
> Hello EG members,
>
> We seem to have overlooked the following critical issues in the
> specification, some of them brought to our attention based on your
> feedback.
>
> 1148: Numerous bugs in the PDL documentation
>
https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1148
>
> 570: Missing description field in javascript event payload
>
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=570
>
> 578: Change javascript payload "name" to "status"
>
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=578
>
> Since the JSF 2.0 final artifacts have not been pushed on the JCP
> site yet, we would like to use this opportunity to make these
> critical changes to the artifacts and then push it to the JCP
> website. We would like to use this opportunity to fix these issues
> so that this is taken into effect in the EE 6 platform spec.
>
> More changes from your feedback and our analysis will come in an MR.
> Currently proposed changes for this MR can be found
here:http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Projects/Jsf2MR1ChangeLog
> .
> The change log is still a work in progress as more issues have been
> conveyed by the EG, but have not yet been added to the log.
>
> Please confirm within 48 hours that is, close of your business day,
> Jun 25th if you approve these 3 changes. Even one vote received
> against these changes will result in dropping this effort.
>
> Thanks you for your understanding.
> Ed / Roger
>