Hi Matthias, Yeah, I was being lazy in the email, I meant to ask for feedback on whether it should be a suffix mapping, a prefix mapping or both :-) I'm no expert on this, but I see no harm in the both option. On 5 Nov 2009, at 06:50, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hello friends and /dev/null ... > > I'd like to see a sentence like that, however I prefer that /faces/* > is present as well. > So it should be IMO an "and" ... > > -Matthias > > Martin Marinschek wrote: >> +1 as well! >> >> regards, >> >> Martin >> >> On 11/5/09, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>>> "If the JSF container is used in a Servlet 3 (or newer) >>>> environment, it >>>> should register an implementation of ServletContainerInitializer >>>> (using >>>> Service Providers from the JAR file specification). The >>>> ServletContainerInitializer should register the FacesServlet, with >>>> a name >>>> of >>>> Faces Servlet, if an existing servlet is not yet registered with this >>>> name. >>>> Furthermore, a suffix mapping of *.jsf [and/or a prefix mapping of >>>> /faces/*] >>>> should be added." >>>> >>>> >>> Well said. +1 from me. >>> >>> -Dan >>> >>> -- >>> Dan Allen >>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action >>> Registered Linux User #231597 >>> >>> http://mojavelinux.com >>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen >>> >>> >> >> >>