AS> identified in the interface section. Perhaps the verb "implements" AS> captures this better than "insert"? AS> <composite:interface> AS> <composite:actionSource name="loginButton"/> AS> </composite:interface> AS> <composite:implementation> AS> <h:commandButton> AS> <composite:implementsActionSource name="loginButton"/> AS> </h:commandButton> AS> </composite:implementation> AS> In any case, regardless of the tag name, I think that this is a much AS> improved approach. Thanks for pushing this Jakob (and Leonardo, Martin AS> and Ganesh too)! JK> Thanks, Andy! Frankly I also do not really like the term "insert" JK> here, because - as you said - it just does not fit that well. However JK> I really, really like "implements" - this is just soo much better :) If we're talking verbs here, I think an even better one is "exposes". The component implements the thing whether it's exposed or not. What we're really doing here is exposing the fact that it has a behavioral interface attached object target. Ed -- | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/ | 8 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference