[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-2577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Ramesh Reddy commented on TEIID-2577:
-------------------------------------
Bringing the client semantics to the translation layer is an anti-pattern to me, the
connection is needed to either do further work that should have handled before the request
got to the translator layer, or based on the current execution further work is needs to be
queued.
If I am understanding the forum text correctly, the need for temp table arises because
they did not want write caching facilities at translator layer, instead the job delegated
back to engine to use a temp table. Now to use session scoped temp table we are saying we
need the same connection back. It seems like we are driving towards what may be a context
aware stateless connector execution to state-full execution. Correct me if I am wrong,
but providing this as feature at API level does not seem correct to me.
Translator API to provide session backed connection
---------------------------------------------------
Key: TEIID-2577
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-2577
Project: Teiid
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Mark Addleman
Assignee: Steven Hawkins
Provide an API (probably from an ExecutionContext) to obtain a JDBC connection to the
same Teiid instance under the client's session.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira