Data result not correct when joinning subquery over a date field ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: TEIID-3276 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3276 Project: Teiid Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Tawk Assignee: Steven Hawkins Priority: Critical Hello, I'm using Teiid 8.9.0 To execute the below query and the execution is done without the problem; the issue is that I'm getting different results when executing the same query over mysql The original query is much bigger but i tried to simplify it to isolate the problem. SELECT DISTINCT WEEK(contactcalldetail.startdatetime) AS contactcalldetail_startdatet, sessionid_Sub.contactcalldetail_sessionid AS contactcalldetail_sessionid FROM db_cra_8F_VDB_DSModel.db_cra.contactcalldetail contactcalldetail LEFT JOIN /* optional */ (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT contactcalldetail_sub.sessionid) AS contactcalldetail_sessionid, WEEK(contactcalldetail_sub.startdatetime) AS contactcalldetail_startdatet FROM db_cra_8F_VDB_DSModel.db_cra.contactcalldetail contactcalldetail_sub WHERE (((contactcalldetail_sub.contacttype IN (1)))) AND ((((contactcalldetail_sub.connecttime >= 300)))) GROUP BY WEEK(contactcalldetail_sub.startdatetime)) sessionid_Sub ON (WEEK(contactcalldetail.startdatetime) = sessionid_Sub.contactcalldetail_startdatet) WHERE (((contactcalldetail.contacttype IN (1)))) LIMIT 0, 10 Here is Teiid execution plan : <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><node name="LimitNode"><property name="Output Columns"><value>contactcalldetail_startdatet (integer)</value><value>contactcalldetail_sessionid (integer)</value></property><property name="Statistics"><value>Node Output Rows: 1</value><value>Node Next Batch Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Cumulative Next Batch Process Time: 12</value><value>Node Cumulative Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Next Batch Calls: 3</value><value>Node Blocks: 2</value></property><property name="Cost Estimates"><value>Estimated Node Cardinality: 10.0</value></property><property name="Child 0"><node name="SortNode"><property name="Output Columns"><value>contactcalldetail_startdatet (integer)</value><value>contactcalldetail_sessionid (integer)</value></property><property name="Statistics"><value>Node Output Rows: 1</value><value>Node Next Batch Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Cumulative Next Batch Process Time: 12</value><value>Node Cumulative Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Next Batch Calls: 3</value><value>Node Blocks: 2</value></property><property name="Cost Estimates"><value>Estimated Node Cardinality: -1.0</value></property><property name="Child 0"><node name="ProjectNode"><property name="Output Columns"><value>contactcalldetail_startdatet (integer)</value><value>contactcalldetail_sessionid (integer)</value></property><property name="Statistics"><value>Node Output Rows: 4096</value><value>Node Next Batch Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Cumulative Next Batch Process Time: 13</value><value>Node Cumulative Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Next Batch Calls: 5</value><value>Node Blocks: 3</value></property><property name="Cost Estimates"><value>Estimated Node Cardinality: -1.0</value></property><property name="Child 0"><node name="JoinNode"><property name="Output Columns"><value>startdatetime (timestamp)</value><value>contactcalldetail_sessionid (integer)</value></property><property name="Statistics"><value>Node Output Rows: 4096</value><value>Node Next Batch Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Cumulative Next Batch Process Time: 11</value><value>Node Cumulative Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Next Batch Calls: 5</value><value>Node Blocks: 3</value></property><property name="Cost Estimates"><value>Estimated Node Cardinality: -1.0</value></property><property name="Child 0"><node name="AccessNode"><property name="Output Columns"><value>startdatetime (timestamp)</value><value>expr (integer)</value></property><property name="Statistics"><value>Node Output Rows: 4096</value><value>Node Next Batch Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Cumulative Next Batch Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Cumulative Process Time: 0</value><value>Node Next Batch Calls: 7</value><value>Node Blocks: 5</value></property><property name="Cost Estimates"><value>Estimated Node Cardinality: -1.0</value></property><property name="Query"><value>SELECT DISTINCT g_0.startdatetime AS c_0, WEEK(g_0.startdatetime) AS c_1 FROM db_cra_8F_VDB_DSModel.db_cra.contactcalldetail AS g_0 WHERE g_0.contacttype = 1 ORDER BY c_1</value></property><property name="Model Name"><value>db_cra_8F_VDB_DSModel</value></property></node></property><property name="Child 1"><node name="ProjectNode"><property name="Output Columns"><value>contactcalldetail_startdatet (integer)</value><value>contactcalldetail_sessionid (integer)</value></property><property name="Statistics"><value>Node Output Rows: 3</value><value>Node Next Batch Process Time: 7</value><value>Node Cumulative Next Batch Process Time: 8</value><value>Node Cumulative Process Time: 15</value><value>Node Next Batch Calls: 2</value><value>Node Blocks: 1</value></property><property name="Cost Estimates"><value>Estimated Node Cardinality: -1.0</value></property><property name="Child 0"><node name="GroupingNode"><property name="Output Columns"><value>gcol0 (integer)</value><value>agg0 (integer)</value></property><property name="Statistics"><value>Node Output Rows: 3</value><value>Node Next Batch Process Time: 14</value><value>Node Cumulative Next Batch Process Time: 8</value><value>Node Cumulative Process Time: 15</value><value>Node Next Batch Calls: 2</value><value>Node Blocks: 1</value></property><property name="Cost Estimates"><value>Estimated Node Cardinality: -1.0</value></property><property name="Child 0"><node name="AccessNode"><property name="Output Columns"><value>startdatetime (timestamp)</value><value>sessionid (long)</value></property><property name="Statistics"><value>Node Output Rows: 772</value><value>Node Next Batch Process Time: 9</value><value>Node Cumulative Next Batch Process Time: 1</value><value>Node Cumulative Process Time: 9</value><value>Node Next Batch Calls: 2</value><value>Node Blocks: 1</value></property><property name="Cost Estimates"><value>Estimated Node Cardinality: -1.0</value></property><property name="Query"><value>SELECT g_0.startdatetime, g_0.sessionid FROM db_cra_8F_VDB_DSModel.db_cra.contactcalldetail AS g_0 WHERE (g_0.contacttype = 1) AND (g_0.connecttime >= 300)</value></property><property name="Model Name"><value>db_cra_8F_VDB_DSModel</value></property></node></property><property name="Grouping Columns"><value>WEEK(contactcalldetail_sub.startdatetime)</value></property><property name="Sort Mode"><value>false</value></property></node></property><property name="Select Columns"><value>anon_grp0.gcol0 AS contactcalldetail_startdatet</value><value>anon_grp0.agg0 AS contactcalldetail_sessionid</value></property></node></property><property name="Join Strategy"><value>MERGE JOIN (ALREADY_SORTED/SORT)</value></property><property name="Join Type"><value>LEFT OUTER JOIN</value></property><property name="Join Criteria"><value>WEEK(contactcalldetail.startdatetime)=sessionid_Sub.contactcalldetail_startdatet</value></property></node></property><property name="Select Columns"><value>WEEK(contactcalldetail.startdatetime) AS contactcalldetail_startdatet</value><value>sessionid_Sub.contactcalldetail_sessionid AS contactcalldetail_sessionid</value></property></node></property><property name="Sort Mode"><value>DUP_REMOVE</value></property></node></property><property name="Row Offset"><value>null</value></property><property name="Row Limit"><value>10</value></property></node> Here are the 2 JDBC queries executed by Teiid: SELECT DISTINCT g_0.`startdatetime` AS c_0, week(g_0.`startdatetime`) AS c_1 FROM `db_cra`.`contactcalldetail` AS g_0 WHERE g_0.`contacttype` = 1 ORDER BY c_1 SELECT g_0.`startdatetime`, g_0.`sessionid` FROM `db_cra`.`contactcalldetail` AS g_0 WHERE g_0.`contacttype` = 1 AND g_0.`connecttime` >= 300 Teiid query execution result is : week countsession 36 null 37 328 38 384 mysql execution result: week countsession 35 328 36 384 37 60 You can notice that the week is incremented by one and the count result is scrambled