Gavin,
Do you think we should also write BNF for the annotations as is done
with JSR-330? I think most will appreciate examples better, but for
those with some CS background, the BNF is always clear too. I'm
undecided myself whether it is worth it or not.
- David
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 02:08 -0400, Gavin King wrote:
I did a first rev of the javadoc for the package javax.decorator.
Take a look.
Not perfect, by any means, but its a good start. Note that I basically
just copied and pasted out of the spec, and then massaged a little
bit.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> David just asked me about exactly what I want from the Javadoc. Here's
> a rough guide:
>
> The goal is that people should be just about able to use things from
> just reading javadoc. It doesnt need to baby people, or explain things
> that are not directly relevant to the particular annotation, or go
> into very technical definitions, but it should contain all the
> information about:
>
> * what the annotation or interface is for,
> * how it is used,
> * what other annotations or interfaces it is used together with,
> * what its behavior is, and
> * the example(s) of its use.
>
> If the user has to go digging about in the spec to figure out what an
> annotation does, they are already wasting time and they will already
> think 299 is "hard". Our goal is that reasonably sophisticated users
> should be able to get up and running with this stuff *without* needing
> additional docs.
>
> Note that the *.spi packages do not need to be documented at quite the
> same level as the application-developer-visible stuff.
>
>
>
> --
> Gavin King
> gavin.king(a)gmail.com
>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>
http://hibernate.org
>
http://seamframework.org
>