Re: [weld-dev] persistence and transactions outside Java EE

Ah. Standalone JCA is a problem. But do we really need JCA, or can we just let Hibernate use one of the standalone connection pools that it ships with? On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Pete Muir<pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote: > I chatted to Jonathan about this, he tells me the binary for JBossTS JTA is under 1MB with no external dependencies other than the JTA API (but we would probably need standalone JCA too). > > On 18 Nov 2009, at 23:10, Gavin King wrote: > >> I think we should try and follow the Java EE models as closely as >> possible for this stuff. We should simply try and make the Java EE >> code work outside EE 6. >> >> e.g. >> >> (1) use a resource declaration with @PersistenceContext(unitName=....) >> to define a managed persistence context >> (2) use JBoss Transactions to manage transactions in a servlet engine >> - so instead of having a special tx manager for JDBC, it is just JTA >> >> Or is the 10meg download for JBoss Transactions just no good? >> >> -- >> Gavin King >> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >> http://hibernate.org >> http://seamframework.org >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > >