Huh? The spec does not in any way limit the visibility of the bean
constructor. So any visibility must be supported!
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:21 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Yes, the spec makes no statements here I know of. I don't think
the
TCK should restrict the impl like that anyway, so please file a
CDKTCK issue (and say the FQCN, as there are multiple classes called
MissileInterceptor).
Thanks!
On 30 Nov 2009, at 09:13, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Gavin,
>
> The spec imho says nothing about the visibility of constructors
> (e.g. in 3.1.1. and others).
> But the TCK sometimes assumes that even package scoped classes
> (e.g. MissileInterceptor) which can _not_ be constructed with new
> must be injected. This feels a bit unnatural to me since there may
> be a very good reason to hide e.g. private constructors or even
> whole classes.
>
> Have I overseen something in the spec or do we need to clarify some
> parts?
>
> Txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden
> Schutz gegen Massenmails.
>
http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev