Re: [weld-dev] [cdi-dev] microbenchmark for CDI performance

On Tuesday, 21 October 2014, 14:07, Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Btw I've run your benchmark locally and observed the following results: OWB 1.2.6: 9827ms Weld 2.2.5.Final: 20ms ;-) I did however tweak the test a bit so that Weld's optimizations can be leveraged[1]. I admit that in certain situations (like your test without my change) Weld performs worse than it should and this is a good input for us. As for the NPE you observed not sure what is going on there. Perhaps WeldContextControl implementation in DeltaSpike is not really thread safe? Jozef [1] https://github.com/jharting/cdi-performance/commits/weld On 10/21/2014 01:43 PM, Jozef Hartinger wrote: > Hi Mark, > > thanks for showcasting your new feature. Great to see OWB getting > faster! As for the micro benchmark I suggest that you check out JMH[1]. > > If you need an input from the Weld team, use weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/ > > On 10/21/2014 11:59 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Weld folks, I need some help with a micro benchmark: >> >> You know we've talked about disk footprint in SE, so I hacked together a small microbenchmark and as a side effect we also got what is really needed to have CDI running >> >> https://github.com/struberg/cdi-performance >> >> I'm curious about missing some dependency excludes for Weld. >> >> could you please run >> >> $> mvn clean dependency:copy-dependencies -DincludeScope=compile -PWeld -Dweld.version=2.2.5.Final >> $> ls -al target/dependency/ >> >> and tell me which dependencies can be without having some CDI functionality missing? >> >> Feel free to pimp the pom and ship a pull request. >> >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.