As I said, jsf will still be entirely optional, it's just we will no longer support
jsf 1.2
Pete Muir
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Allen
<dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> AFACIT this will really force Tomcat etc. users to use JSF2...
>>
>
> Yep. I think this is a matter of us leaving the fence and deciding that we
> are going to advocate the EE 6 technology stack as a baseline. We are
> recommending a new programming model, after all, so I think it's consistent
> to select the optimal compliments. I've was thinking along the same lines
> for Seam Servlet...we should really be assuming we have Servlet 3, or at the
> very least the Servlet-CDI integration (which Weld Servlet patches in).
> Otherwise, we sort of look hesitant in our message to adopt EE 6. So I'm all
> for it.
Yuck.
-Clint
(Loves CDI, uses wicket, deploys a large app on a cluster of 30 tomcat
instances, doesn't want a needless jsf dependency.)
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
>
http://mojavelinux.com
>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
--
Clint Popetz
http://42lines.net
Scalable Web Application Development