Re: [weld-dev] Stateless scope in Weld?

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:24, Clint Popetz <cpopetz(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Adam Warski <adam(a)warski.org&gt; wrote: Hello, have you considered adding a stateless scope to Weld? I've definitely felt the paint of not having this, for all the reasons stated. I agree with both of you and have attempted to defend this position in the past. I thought using a dependent-scoped bean with Instance<T>#get() would be sufficient, but I didn't think about the passivation requirement. We need a truly stateless scope in CDI. I define it as a non-storing context. The reference is resolved each time the proxy dereferenced (method call). -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev