Re: [weld-dev] Supporting namespaces in Java EE config files (non-portable feature for JBoss AS)
Yes, this is possibly a better option - makes it very clear to the end user that this is a
JBoss specific feature, but keeps the ease of use of not having to learn a new syntax.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-7489
On 26 Nov 2009, at 14:57, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
Why not allow JavaEE namespaced elements in the JBoss variant?
That would give you ease of use and would explicitly put portability out of scope.
Carlo
On 11/25/2009 03:02 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Something that came up during our Seam team meeting was the issue of config files
again. We wanted to investigate again why we can't put namespaced elements into
existing java ee config files such as application.xml, ejb-jar.xml, web.xml, but instead
have to provide our own... Of course, this is non portable, but it would make life easier
for users in our opinion.
>
> Previously we have heard that this would cause us to fail the TCK, but given that
this code would never run in the EE TCK, I can't see how.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>