On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de> wrote:
short question:
> * removing interceptor language from spec
Hmm without interceptors, how should we handle @Transactional and stuff? Having
interceptors in the standard is pretty convenient.
This got moved to the managed bean specification which 299 depends on.
LieGrue,
strub
--- Pete Muir <pmuir(a)bleepbleep.org.uk> schrieb am Do, 21.5.2009:
> Von: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)bleepbleep.org.uk>
> Betreff: [webbeans-dev] Towards CR1
> An: webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> CC: ee6jboss(a)sun.com, roger.kitain(a)sun.com
> Datum: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2009, 19:36
> All,
>
> As you've seen, Gavin is approaching publishing the PFD of
> 299; before the final draft can be submitted, we need to
> complete both the RI and TCK. We're under quite a tight
> schedule - we have around 6 weeks.
>
> 1) Shane will update the TCK audit (which maps the spec to
> the tests) to the current draft. Hopefully we will start to
> see this coming through early next week. Once this is done,
> we'll have a better idea of how much work there is to do.
>
> 2) David will take the lead on updating tests to the new
> TCK, with Shane working to help him. The order in which the
> tests are done should be same as for the RI
>
> 3) We'll do the major work on the RI in this priority
> order:
> - New SPI
> - New bootstrap
> - decorators
> - New resource handling stuff
> - minor fixes and changes as a result of
> the new spec language
>
> If you want to take on any of the above, please shout now!
>
> We still need clarification from Gavin/EG on:
>
> * removing interceptor language from spec
> * exactly how this inter-relates with the managed bean
> spec
> * exactly how we proceed when the RI supports a particular
> function which requires container integration, and no one
> container supports all integration points.
>
> I don't plan any interim releases between now and CR1, as
> releases take time, and we are under a tight schedule. These
> changes don't generally impact the core functionality
> (except around bootstrap), so I am confident that we don't
> need another beta.
>
> I do plan a reasonably long series of CRs to ensure that
> the codebase is stable, I don't have a firm date for the
> release yet. Once we enter the CR series, the 299 API and
> the Web Beans API/SPI cannot change.
>
> Thanks for all your hard work so far - getting to CR1 is a
> major milestone!
>
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
--
Pete Muir
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
http://www.seamframework.org