Yes, this is required and useful.
However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied
via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is
written to allow the interception to be implemented without any
separate proxy object at all (using a subclass).
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi;
Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should
not be called for dependent scoped beans?
Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped
beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and
@Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are
useful or necessary?
Thanks;
--Gurkan
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org