Re: [weld-dev] Fwd: @AroundInvoke -- JCDI vs EJB3 and return type Object?

Is this a minor bug in the spec? If this s the case, please also review the example in 9.5.1. br, Sven ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sven Linstaedt <sven.linstaedt(a)googlemail.com&gt; Date: 2009/10/23 Subject: Re: @AroundInvoke -- JCDI vs EJB3 and return type Object? To: openwebbeans-dev(a)incubator.apache.org At a first glance I would consider this a bug in the example. I can not imagine Gavin introduced some kind of "special interceptors for void returning methods". This would rather be a use case for decorators. I will forward your question to the jboss list, if you don't mind. Besides... thanks for for the review. br, Sven 2009/10/22 Eric Covener <covener(a)apache.org&gt; > > Interceptor methods with @AroundInvoke in EJB3 requires a return type > of Object, which is enforced by > WebBeansUtil.java::checkAroundInvokeAnnotationCriterias().    In EJB3, > Interceptors return InvocationContext.proceed() to their caller. > > However it seems that @AroundInvoke in JCDI is documented somewhat > differently -- in the JCDI spec (1.3.6) the example has a void return > type and just calls InvocationContext.proceed(). > > Should the JCDI spec example look just like EJB3, or is this an > OWB-specific restriction? > > -- > Eric Covener > covener(a)gmail.com _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev