So now I'm changing the spec back??
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Pete Muir <pete.muir(a)jboss.org> wrote:
Good point. I altered the API to not return bounded wildcards...
On 7 May 2009, at 10:53, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Returning bounded wildcards makes APIs quite annoying to use, is that
> necessary?
>
> On May 7, 2009, at 04:35, Gavin King wrote:
>
>> I also notice that you have:
>>
>> public abstract Set<? extends InjectionPoint> getInjectionPoints();
>>
>> are you sure that is correct? Do I also need to make that change?
>>
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, I see you already made this change in the RI, so I will make it in
>>> the spec.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Pete Muir <pete.muir(a)jboss.org>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Probably should be
>>>>
>>>> public abstract Set<? extends Type> getTypes();
>>>>
>>>> not
>>>>
>>>> public abstract Set<Type> getTypes();
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Pete Muir
>>>>
http://www.seamframework.org
>>>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gavin King
>>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com
>>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>>
http://hibernate.org
>>>
http://seamframework.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com
>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>
http://hibernate.org
>>
http://seamframework.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete