Ugh, this is an oversight in the spec. :-(
Let me think this through.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Marius Bogoevici <mariusb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
The specification allows for decorators to be abstract classes, but
this
is currently not supported in Weld (defect WELD-298).
Since allowing decorator classes to be abstract is the only stated
requirement, here are the general lines I think we should follow for
supporting this:
- abstract decorator classes can have injected fields, injected
constructor parameters and concrete initializer methods, but abstract
initializer methods should be forbidden (DefinitionException), or at the
very least be non-portable.
- abstract decorator classes cannot have abstract decorating methods
(DefinitionException)
WDYT?
Marius
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org