Hello
Thanks for the link. I had a look but I couldn't find any TCK tests
checking to see if an observer method will catch the new
ConversationContext being created for the "new transient conversation". To
check if a new conversation was activated I created an entirely fresh
server and ran the test application on it, the behaviour was the same, the
first url I pinged on this new server ended with "cid=" and the observer
didn't . Normally I've just been restarting the old server but restarting
frequently.
I've attached the recreate you requested. it consists of the three classes
attached to my previous email as well as a minimal html page. To run it
load it onto your server and ping
http://localhost:9080/ConversationContextTest/index.xhtml to see the
observer fire, and
http://localhost:9080/ConversationContextTest/index.xhtml?cid=99999 to see
the observer fail to fire.
Best regards
Benjamin
From: Matej Novotny <manovotn(a)redhat.com>
To: Benjamin Confino <BENJAMIC(a)uk.ibm.com>
Cc: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org, Takayuki T Ishii <EBB0F3L(a)jp.ibm.com>
Date: 27/01/2020 11:39
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [weld-dev] Question about conversations
scope initilization obeserver
Hello,
I'd start by pointing you to CDI TCK as that's a good starting point to
see what's covered.
For your question, that would be this test -
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_eclipse-2...
And possibly few more in the same test class.
As for the linked classes - your `ConversationBean` is listening for
@Initialized event. Can you verify that a new conversation was activated
for your request instead of verifying that context was activated?
E.g. check IDs or something along those lines? I suppose that will hold
true and in that case it works just as spec requires it to.
From the top of my head I don't really know how we
activate/deactivate
ConversationContext, I'd need to dig that up, but looking
at CDI spec, it
doesn't mandate that it is activated every time again and it could already
be active for given request.
Plus from just the classes you linked, I cannot know if you test this with
no existing conversation or maybe with some long running one before you
try to send a request for non-existing one...and so on.
So if the above doesn't is not enough to answer your question, then we're
going to need a complete reproducer so that we both talk about the same
scenario :)
Matej
----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin Confino" <BENJAMIC(a)uk.ibm.com>
To: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Cc: "Takayuki T Ishii" <EBB0F3L(a)jp.ibm.com>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 11:42:14 AM
Subject: [weld-dev] Question about conversations scope initilization
obeserver
Hello
I have a customer who's sent me a sample application, I have attached
the
source to it below.
When the customer visits index.xhtml they see the following output:
Conversation initialized.
Conversation begun. cid:1 , timeout:3600000
Conversation destroyed. cid:1
However when they append "?cdi=" or a non-existnant identifier like
"?cdi=10000" to the url they do not see "Conversation initialized."
The CDI spec says that: If the propagated conversation cannot be
restored,
the container must associate the request with a new transient
conversation
and throw an exception of type
javax.enterprise.context.NonexistentConversationException.
I'm wondering if this should apply here? Or would it only apply if the
cid
pointed to an existing conversation that could not be restored? And
is
there
anything in the spec that covers this specific situation?
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU