Hi Scott From the spec, "The event object must be of type javax.enterprise.inject.spi.ProcessObserverMethod<T, X>, where T is the bean class of the bean that declares the observer method and X is the observed event type of the observer method. public interface ProcessObserverMethod<T, X> { public AnnotatedParameter<T> getAnnotatedEventParameter(); public ObserverMethod<X> getObserverMethod(); public void addDefinitionError(Throwable t); } " It looks like this has got completely wrong against the javadoc and signatures released with the spec, I will go to the EE CTS guys and see what the best path forward is, however I suspect it is unfixable until we do a MR. I will also go back in and fix this test so that it works correctly against the API as defined in the javadoc.

Pete On 18 Nov 2010, at 00:07, Scott Ferguson wrote: > Hi Pete, > > I'm looking at the TCK snapshot and at CDITCK-174, but I don't > understand the change. The original looks correct to me and I don't see > how the new change is supposed to work or why it was made. > > In ProcessObserverMethodErrorTest, there's a listener: > > public void observeObserverMethodForEventB( > @Observes ProcessObserverMethod<?,EventB> event > ); > > But the ProcessObserverMethod is defined as > > public interface ProcessObserverMethod<T,X> { > public ObserverMethod<T> getObserverMethod(); > public AnnotatedMethod<X> getAnnotatedMethod(); > public void addDefinitionError(Throwable t); > } > > In other words, "T" is the type of the event and "X" is the type of the > listener, but the observer flips those around. > > I double checked with the latest weld and with cdi-api.sig, but it > doesn't look like the ProcessObserverMethod itself has changed. > > Is there something I'm missing? > > -- Scott > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >