Re: [bv-dev] Cross parameter validation convergence
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
On Jeu 2012-09-06 11:29, Michael Nascimento wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Matt Benson <mbenson(a)apache.org> wrote:
> > My inclination here would be to require unique signatures, and apply
> > full JLS method matching rules.
>
> I agree, they have given plenty of thought about it while working on
> the JLS and I don't think we can do much better - but there is a lot
> of room for doing worse.
The rules are quite complex so before we end up having coding them, I
want to make sure every one likes them more than direct matching :)
I could live with direct matching, at that. In fact, that might
actually be better in this case. Mainly unique signatures is the
important thing, and we'll already avoid collision between a type-safe
validation method and the generic method by hosting them on different
interfaces, right?
Matt
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev