Hi Marco,
Nice research! Out of curiosity, how did you get these numbers?
Historically, the spec stayed on the conservative end in terms of built-in
constraints. @NotEmpty etc. can quite easily be implemented or even just be
composed based on other built-in constraints. But the numbers you shared
indeed indicate some usefulness of adding at least some.
Would be interesting to know what others think?
Cheers,
--Gunnar
2016-08-22 20:32 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Ebbers <hendrik.ebbers(a)me.com>:
+1
Am 22.08.2016 um 19:37 schrieb Marco Molteni <moltenma(a)gmail.com>:
Hi all,
It would be possible to add some built-in constraints to the V 2.0?
@NotBlank, @NotEmpty, @Length are used very often in projects, they are
already present in Hibernate Validator and their implementation is well
defined.
What do you think?
Here a list of the most used constraint for GitHub's projects (the numbers
change at every request but you get the idea. HV = Hibernate Validator,
BV = Bean Validation):
189'143 - BV - NotNull
56'902 - BV - Size
39'551 - HV - NotEmpty <-
20'687 - HV - NotBlank <-
17'735 - BV - Pattern
16'763 - HV - Email
16'033 - BV - Min
12'769 - HV - Length <-
7'806 - BV - Digits
4'982 - BV - Max
4'971 - BV - Past
3'598 - BV - DecimalMin
2'753 - BV - AssertTrue
2'379 - BV - DecimalMax
2'308 - BV - Future
1'999 - HV - Range
1'497 - HV - URL
< 1'000 other constraints
Thanks
Cheers
Marco
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev