Re: [bv-dev] Proposal for supporting new Java 8 date/time types

Hi guys, I was finally able to write something before taking my flight this morning. Let me know what you think: https://github.com/sjmisterm/beanvalidation.org/blob/ 760cd54cb1f00bac1ae88d749d01cf80fe79f899/proposals/BVAL-496.adoc Regards, Michael On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:04 AM, John Hendrikx <hjohn(a)xs4all.nl&gt; wrote: > >> > Another thing: If @Future and @Past support types like LocalDate, >> YearMonth and Year, should we perhaps enhance them to allow the user >> to specify that the "current" year/month/date should also be valid? >> >> That's a very good point, too! This one has been specifically >> brought up with https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-466 >> <https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/BVAL-466>;. It seems sensible >> to add an annotation parameter for this given the support for these >> non-instant types. When looking at your example, I'd have a hard >> time though to reason the exact semantics of inclusive(). I hope we >> could find something more descriptive? >> >> >> I agree that "inclusive" isn't a good name. I'm open for any ideas. ;-) > > Perhaps just provide annotations for their inverse. > > NotFuture/NotInFuture = past + now (past inclusive) > NotPast/NotInPast = future + now (future inclusive) > > Or perhaps a general modifying annotation, that can be applied to > everything to invert the matching logic: > > @Not > > Inverts the matching logic on this element. > > @Not @Past > @Not @Pattern("TRUE|FALSE") // hard to write without the @Not > > --John > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev