Re: [bv-dev] BV 2.0 - Add constraints?

Nice form!! I'm sharing it in adopt JSR program email list. On 15 Sep 2016 03:46, "Gunnar Morling" <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a survey using Google Forms on our blog (staging atm.): > http://staging.beanvalidation.org/news/2016/09/15/ > which-constraints-to-add/ > > Feedback welcome. Unless I hear back otherwise, I'll push it to the > production site tomorrow and then let's announce it on Twitter to get some > answers. I'd leave it open for two weeks (allowing people to reply after J1 > which is next week), which should be plenty of time. > > One question I have is should we allow anonymous voting or require > logging in via Google. The latter prevents double votes, but it raises the > level for participation and don't think people feel motivated to vote > several times on this topic really. > > Andy thoughts? > > Thanks, > > --Gunnar > > > 2016-09-14 12:02 GMT+02:00 Marco Molteni <moltenma(a)gmail.com&gt;: > >> I agree about @Length. It was listed only because of the frequency. I'd >> limit the addition to @NotBlank and @NotEmpty. >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Btw. I don't see a strong reason for @Length, as we have @Size in the >>> spec for it already. >>> >>> I think it's commonly used in older applications which migrated from HV >>> 3.x (proprietary API) to HV 4.x (BV RI) and kept using the legacy >>> constraint instead of using the spec'-ed @Size. >>> >>> 2016-09-14 11:48 GMT+02:00 Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt;: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I like the idea of collecting some more feedback from the community. >>>> >>>> A blog post may be an option, though I reckon feedback will be sparse >>>> based on previous experiences. I'd rather do a survey as it's more >>>> actionable for people. Either on Twitter (though that seems a bit limited) >>>> or using Google Forms [1], which is my preference. >>>> >>>> I'll prepare something and share it with you soon. If the survey looks >>>> good, we can promote it on Twitter and during the Hackergarten at J1 (of >>>> course talking to people in person there will be a great chance to learn >>>> about their wishes, too). >>>> >>>> It'd be nice if we got some insight from that. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> --Gunnar >>>> >>>> [1] https://docs.google.com/forms/ >>>> >>>> >>>> 2016-09-09 11:34 GMT+02:00 Marco Molteni <moltenma(a)gmail.com&gt;: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> which is the best / common way to get a representative feedback >>>>> according to your experience? >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Christian Kaltepoth < >>>>> christian(a)kaltepoth.de&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I also think that adding the most popular 3rd party constraints >>>>>> directly to the spec is a good thing. Especially @NotBlank and @NotEmpty. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, I also agree that it would be nice to gather more feedback >>>>>> from the community to learn which constraints people would like to see in >>>>>> the spec. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2016-09-06 20:50 GMT+02:00 Michael Nascimento <misterm(a)gmail.com&gt;: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 to including them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Marco Molteni <moltenma(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > Hi all, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > It would be possible to add some built-in constraints to the V >>>>>>> 2.0? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > @NotBlank, @NotEmpty, @Length are used very often in projects, >>>>>>> they are >>>>>>> > already present in Hibernate Validator and their implementation >>>>>>> is well >>>>>>> > defined. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > What do you think? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Here a list of the most used constraint for GitHub's projects >>>>>>> (the numbers >>>>>>> > change at every request but you get the idea. HV = Hibernate >>>>>>> Validator, BV = >>>>>>> > Bean Validation): >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > 189'143 - BV - NotNull >>>>>>> > 56'902 - BV - Size >>>>>>> > 39'551 - HV - NotEmpty <- >>>>>>> > 20'687 - HV - NotBlank <- >>>>>>> > 17'735 - BV - Pattern >>>>>>> > 16'763 - HV - Email >>>>>>> > 16'033 - BV - Min >>>>>>> > 12'769 - HV - Length <- >>>>>>> > 7'806 - BV - Digits >>>>>>> > 4'982 - BV - Max >>>>>>> > 4'971 - BV - Past >>>>>>> > 3'598 - BV - DecimalMin >>>>>>> > 2'753 - BV - AssertTrue >>>>>>> > 2'379 - BV - DecimalMax >>>>>>> > 2'308 - BV - Future >>>>>>> > 1'999 - HV - Range >>>>>>> > 1'497 - HV - URL >>>>>>> > < 1'000 other constraints >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Cheers >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Marco >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> > beanvalidation-dev mailing list >>>>>>> > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list >>>>>>> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Christian Kaltepoth >>>>>> Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ >>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal >>>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/chkal >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list >>>>>> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list >>>>> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list >>> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> beanvalidation-dev mailing list >> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev >