Hello Antoine,
does it make sense to have close() and shutdown() in CDISE? Isn't close()
enough?
in findContainerBuilder: iterator shouldn't be called twice I think
About naming: CDISE looks too much an anagram so maybe StandaloneCDI (I'd
prefer "Standalone" to "SE") or even UserManagedCDI
About packaging: ".standalone" is good enough IMO
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <
2016-06-20 10:47 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>:
Hi guys,
I posted modification on PR 290 [1] according to last meeting.
I still have 2 points that stays open for me (you may have more) :
- Place and name of the package: should we decide to package SE support in
a specific jar, it will be probably better to have a better package name at
a higher level
- Name for CDISE class. Perhaps using Container or SeContainer would be
better. WDYT ?
Antoine
[1]
https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.