Hi Jozef,
I thought you didn't like to have temp stuff in the spec, so fr me it was
obvious that we should use the weld experimental package.
Any thoughts?
Antoine
Le lun. 29 juin 2015 à 11:38, Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com> a
écrit :
How do we deal with the lack of parameter-level @Priority in the
meantime?
On 06/25/2015 11:19 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
Hi guys,
The branch 2.0-EDR1 is ready for release.
Beyond the source, you can check javadoc here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/EDR1-Doc/index.html
And spec here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html
Or PDF version:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-2.0-EDR1.pdf
I have still some work on introduction (major changes, etc…) and on
copyright in source files and intend to start release process (three the
JCP) tomorrow.
Antoine
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing
listcdi-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.