[cdi-dev] New version for CDI bootstrap

Hi guys, I posted modification on PR 290 [1] according to last meeting. I still have 2 points that stays open for me (you may have more) : - Place and name of the package: should we decide to package SE support in a specific jar, it will be probably better to have a better package name at a higher level - Name for CDISE class. Perhaps using Container or SeContainer would be better. WDYT ? Antoine [1] https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290