Sure. You have a good point here. We need to solve CLI + exploded.
On 4/13/11 3:54 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
yes, but its limited/not-applicable for exploded deployments.
So could we please say "Please use CLI or console for *production* deployments"
or make the remote management API support exploded deployments/incremental updates ?:)
/max
On Apr 13, 2011, at 05:43, Jason T. Greene wrote:
> Right, and in fact I think we should promote the CLI over FS. It always
> does exactly what you tell it to :)
>
> On 4/12/11 10:21 PM, Jim Tyrrell wrote:
>> I will second this, I hope the console has the ability to "tweak"
these
>> settings, I also would think the command line tool should handle them,
>> from the demo today it looks like it does, or at least does something
>> around deployment.
>>
>> Jim Tyrrell
>> Senior JBoss Solutions Architect
>>
>> Did you see RHT on CNBC's Mad Money?
>>
http://www.cnbc.com/id/39401056
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 12, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Howard Gao wrote:
>>
>>> I think managing those mark files with deployment through a tool is the
>>> right way. If I had such a tool, I don't even care to look into
>>> /deployments directory for any mark files.
>>>
>>> Howard
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/13/2011 06:57 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>> Have you guys talked with Max and the tools team to see what/how
this
>>>>>> effects what they have to do?
>>>>> Yes, I think hes happy with the eventual outcome. Although I will
let
>>>>> him comment :)
>>>>
>>>> Jim, if you look at the forum thread you should see my head show up a
>>>> tons of times ;)
>>>>
>>>> And just to keep it short - I think we found a good balance that
>>>> solves both sides of the story and the
>>>> overall idea is good - especially now that just putting archives in
>>>> the directory will work as you have always
>>>> been used to. There might be some glitches left in the implementation
>>>> but that is why its called a Beta and
>>>> if someone finds issues with it report jira with steps to reproduce.
>>>>
>>>> So if you use archives then stuff just works (even with tools), if
>>>> exploded then you need an explicit marker but
>>>> that is "easily" done in tools; hardest one is actually Maven
but
>>>> should be easy to implement in Cargo.
>>>>
>>>> JBoss Tools trunk supports the notion of .dodeploy files now btw.
>>>>
>>>> Our biggest challenge is the remote API which is unfortunately much
>>>> more shaky at this point than the file deployment....so i'm happy
>>>> the FS API at least works otherwise we would be rather stuck ;)
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>>
jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>
> --
> Jason T. Greene
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat