> I can just put in my 5 cents:
Yep the only one to be happy is Max…
eh - I don't think I was talking about me - just talking about users in general.
The problem is quite hard, external validation takes ages and adding
the logic in the parser = metadata parser is a lot of work :-(
Did you read what I wrote ? :)
I wrote the client/tools should provide ways to validate but not prevent deployment
because the server side is normally more lenient (for one reason is that they tend to not
validate well because thats not what they normally are concerned about)
Of course I would appreciate if the frameworks actually kept more context so once they
actually do get fed garbage they can point out or at least hint about
what part of the garbage they don't like. But that was not what the question was
about.
It was wether client or servers should validate - and I just wanted to point out that if
client tools validates before deployment they should have an option to ignore/skip the
validation because the server might actually be handling it even though the client side
validation says there is an error.
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen