On 2/15/11 9:36 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
On 02/15/2011 04:22 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>> Objections / comments ?
> I object. This is incorrect.
>
> These modules are NOT intended to be a magic repository for appending
> things on to user deployments! These modules are internal
> implementation modules, which nobody should expect to ever appear on a
> user class path.
>
> If you want to add these additional dependencies to EJB and Servlet
> deployments then modify the EJB and Servlet deployers to add these
> dependencies individually.
Right, just to clarify, I think this is basically what's been said with
Carlo and Emanuel later on; is that fine?
IOW the real question here is, are we all OK with having the WS libs in
the runtime classpath of every ejb/servlet deployments? (as a
consequence of the need for supporting the usecases mentioned in
Richard's email)
Cheers
Isn't this just a matter of looking to see if there is a @WebServiceRef
in the annotaiton index?
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat