On 28/03/13 11:27, Stuart Douglas wrote:
Darran Lofthouse wrote:
> However another question for 'ModelControllerClient' are
we also sure we
> will never want to add support for pure HTTP invocations?
That is also a question that will need to be answered for EJB. I know
work is being done on a pure HTTP client, so we need to make sure that
there is no ambiguity there.
Also if we have HTTP upgrade, why would we need a pure HTTP client
library?
I also can't think of reason at the moment, I think the real question is
do we want to rule out the possibility that someone could find one in
the future ;-)
The only reason that I can think of is that if there are some
firewalls that block HTTP upgrade, but I am not really sure if that is
really a thing.
Stuart