The reason why I am asking is, that we basically cannot verify constraints across
domain.xml and host.xml.
I.e. you could have
domain.xml
<interface name="management">
<nic name="eth0"/>
</interface>
and host.xml
<interface name="management">
<not>
<nic name="eth0"/>
</not>
</interface>
That's something I cannot validate in the console. But to improve the situation we
could add a resolveInterface() operation to the host level. Which might be used to verify
the effective configuration before it's written to disk. Otherwise things blowup upon
server bootstrap.
Ike
On Nov 23, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> A setting like this is logical in domain.xml, if the hosts in the domain
> had a consistent configuration:
>
> <interfaces>
> <interface name="management">
<nic name="eth0"/>
</interface>
> <interface
name="public">
> <nic name="eth1"/>
</interface>
> <interface
name="loopback">
> <loopback/>
</interface>
> <interface
name="example">
> <subnet-match value="192.168.100.0/24"/>
</interface>
> </interfaces>
>
> On 11/23/11 7:28 AM, Heiko Braun wrote:
>>
>>
>> Should the top level interface configuration be disabled in domain mode?
>> Opposed to editing the interface son the host level?
>>
>>
>> Ike
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Principal Software Engineer
> JBoss by Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev