The CLI offers low level DMR operation, which offer a lot more possibilities
then the CLI's it's high level commands.
If compare the web interface and the CLI, compare the CLI high level commands to the
web interface. On this level they should remain synced as much as possible.
I am not objecting to implement any nitty gritty dada source configuration option,
but we need to get the priorities straight. Therefore I'd say let's focus on the
frequently used
features for sysadmins and developers.
IMO it's fine with to point users to the the CLI for more fine grained configuration
options.
("the good of the many outweighs the good of the few").
Ike
On Jul 22, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Vimal Kansal wrote:
However, this may lead to an inconsistency of sorts, as using CLI
when you execute :read-resource, you get to see all the configured properties, but when
you use UI, you will see only a subset. I am not sure, how appropriate it would be to have
this inconsistency.