On 4/20/11 9:29 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> A couple of thoughts.
>>>
>>> 1) If we ship with one enabled out of the box I will leave to Jason to
>>> decide - why not save the boot time if we don't need it ?
>>>
>>> 2) We should try and limit (eliminate) subsystem/service dependency on an
>>> active database.
>>>
>>> 3) Having the name as 'DefaultDS' would leave the impression that the
AS
>>> is using the database.
>>>
>>> I think a better route is to have the demos/samples/... just use the
>>> deployment api - through a script to the CLI f.ex. - to create the
>>> necessary resources and deploy their application.
>>
>> or at least introduce something like what ds.xml files were used for ;)
>>
>
> You are pushing your luck, young man...
Well, in my world its easier to copy files to a deployment directory or via managed api
than
to support 3 different way to launch scripts * 2 different ways to handle
Domain/Standalone.
Just saying ;)
Please don't hijack threads. Especially for topics that have already
been beaten to death.
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat