In these examples, why would product A and product B install two different consoles that
overlay each other?
If a product console requires functionality for both A and B it would be in the same
console, no?
On Dec 17, 2012, at 11:12 PM, Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com> wrote:
An example is:
/consoles/1.1 (Installed by EAP)
/consoles/1.2 (Installed by Portal)
/consoles/1.3 (Installed by BRMS)
/consoles/1.4 (installed by a Portal patch)
So in this case the server would start with 1.4. If BRMS was removed, 1.4 would be
picked. If the portal patch was then rolled back, 1.2 would be picked.