Re: [jboss-as7-dev] manual way to do logging?

You're never going to use an annotation processor, ever? They're a standard part of Java. They run automatically when you execute javac or use the standard compiler API. If your IDE can't run a standard build with annotation processing I'd say you have a different problem. On 06/09/2012 10:11 AM, Bill Burke wrote: > Given that my particular project is a maven projec, I'd have to edit my > IDE settings. Again, no thanks... For my project at least, there's no > set up guide for using it with an IDE. (and there won't ever be because > I'm not ever going to use JBoss Logging or anything else that requires a > similar dependency). Just load resteasy using a maven structure. > > On 6/9/12 10:57 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote: >> Incorrect - annotation processing happens as a normal part of the javac >> build. You just have to have the generator on your classpath when you >> compile, same as any other dependency. You don't even need Maven to >> make it work; our examples just refer to Maven because it is by far the >> most common build system used right now. >> >> On 06/09/2012 09:32 AM, Bill Burke wrote: >>> So, I have to pop out of my IDE and run a maven build just to be able to >>> run tests within my IDE? Yikes... Another reason why I just won't use >>> JBoss Logging... >>> >>> On 6/8/12 2:37 PM, Jason T. Greene wrote: >>>> On 6/8/12 3:06 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >>>>> That's the crux really. I always bitch when I have to add a log message with JBoss logging compared to the good old log4j. But I would not meet the requirements. >>>>> >>>>> See it positively, it's annoying enough to add a log or throw an exception that I do it less often and my code is even more efficient :D >>>>> The other annoying bit is when your log interface is in a common module and you work on a dependent module. This requires full recompilation and I am often bitten by this with method not found exceptions. >>>> >>>> We used to have a proxy mode feature for exactly this problem. You would >>>> set a sys prop and it would generate dynamic proxies implementing the >>>> the source code locales. This was quite a bit slower than the compile >>>> generated classes so it was intended to be develop mode only. The idea >>>> was that you just set it in your IDE settings and be done with it. >>>> >>>> It turns out it wasnt used very much, and it relied on runtime >>>> annotation retention, so it was killed. If enough people felt it was a >>>> problem though we could revisit that. >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>> >> >> >