[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-124?page=comments#action_12... ]
Kabir Khan commented on JBMICROCONT-124:
----------------------------------------
It was basically a reminder to check that @Inherited annotated annotations are not
inherited in the sub-class constructor. I have updated the test to show that we get the
same behaviour as when using normal reflection, i.e.
java.lang.reflect.Constructor ctorx = AnnotatedSubClass.class.getConstructors()[0];
java.lang.annotation.Annotation[] anns = ctorx.getAnnotations();
for (int i = 0 ; i < anns.length ; i++)
{
System.out.println("==============> " + anns[i].annotationType() +
" XXXX");
}
would output
==============> interface org.jboss.test.classinfo.support.AnotherAnnotation XXXX
and ignore the @SimpleAnnotation that is placed on the super constructor
Fixme in test org.jboss.test.classinfo.support.AnnotatedSubClass
----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBMICROCONT-124
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-124
Project: JBoss MicroContainer
Issue Type: Task
Components: General
Affects Versions: JBossMC_2_0_0 Beta
Reporter: Adrian Brock
Assigned To: Kabir Khan
Priority: Minor
There is a FIXME in the above class.
Kabir can you update this task to describe the problem.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira