[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-1229) Deadlock during flush

Deadlock during flush --------------------- Key: JGRP-1229 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1229 Project: JGroups Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.10 Environment: Windows Vista, JDK 1.6.0_10, JGroups 2.10.0, JGroups config: flush-tcp.xml with TCPGOSSIP Reporter: Markus Hampel Assignee: Vladimir Blagojevic Fix For: 2.11 In my environment a deadlock during flush occurs under following circumstances: A message is processed wich sends another multicast message. During the processing of the message GMS starts a flush. The sending of the multicast message blocks and the flush fails because the processed message doesn't end. The ABORT_FLUSH message isn't processed because it's not a OOB message. The blocked message never unblocks. The following Threaddump shows the GMS thread and the message processing thread: "ViewHandler,Test,#A" prio=6 tid=0x04015c00 nid=0x1e8 waiting on condition [0x04b0f000] java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (sleeping) at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) at org.jgroups.util.Util.sleep(Util.java:1298) at org.jgroups.util.Util.sleepRandom(Util.java:1377) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS._startFlush(GMS.java:721) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.startFlush(GMS.java:694) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.CoordGmsImpl.handleMembershipChange(CoordGmsImpl.java:189) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS$ViewHandler.process(GMS.java:1390) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS$ViewHandler.run(GMS.java:1344) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) "Incoming-4,Test,#A" prio=6 tid=0x04014000 nid=0x11f4 waiting on condition [0x0497e000] java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (parking) at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) - parking to wait for <0x248b2cd8> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject) at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:198) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2054) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.FLUSH.blockMessageDuringFlush(FLUSH.java:321) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.FLUSH.down(FLUSH.java:254) at org.jgroups.stack.ProtocolStack.down(ProtocolStack.java:894) at org.jgroups.JChannel.down(JChannel.java:1623) at org.jgroups.JChannel.send(JChannel.java:724) ... (Usercode) at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.handleUpEvent(MessageDispatcher.java:640) at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.up(MessageDispatcher.java:772) at org.jgroups.JChannel.up(JChannel.java:1453) at org.jgroups.stack.ProtocolStack.up(ProtocolStack.java:887) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.FLUSH.up(FLUSH.java:435) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STATE_TRANSFER.up(STATE_TRANSFER.java:151) at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.up(FRAG2.java:188) at org.jgroups.protocols.FC.up(FC.java:474) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.up(GMS.java:888) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.up(STABLE.java:234) at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST.handleDataReceived(UNICAST.java:614) at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST.up(UNICAST.java:294) at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK.up(NAKACK.java:707) at org.jgroups.protocols.VERIFY_SUSPECT.up(VERIFY_SUSPECT.java:132) at org.jgroups.protocols.FD.up(FD.java:266) at org.jgroups.protocols.MERGE2.up(MERGE2.java:210) at org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery.up(Discovery.java:281) at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.passMessageUp(TP.java:1009) at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.access$100(TP.java:56) at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$3.run(TP.java:933) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) DEBUG output: 19.08.2010 13:47:41 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl debug FEIN: new=[#C], suspected=[], leaving=[], new view: [#A|1] [#A, #C] 19.08.2010 13:47:41 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl debug FEIN: #A: flush coordinator is starting FLUSH with participants [#A] 19.08.2010 13:47:41 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl debug FEIN: #A: received START_FLUSH, responded with FLUSH_COMPLETED to #A 19.08.2010 13:47:41 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl debug FEIN: #A: blocking for 10000ms 19.08.2010 13:47:43 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl debug FEIN: #A: timed out waiting for flush responses after 2000 ms. Rejecting flush to participants [#A] 19.08.2010 13:47:51 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl debug FEIN: #A: blocking for 10000ms 19.08.2010 13:47:55 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl warn WARNUNG: #A: GMS flush by coordinator failed 19.08.2010 13:47:55 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl debug FEIN: resuming message garbage collection 19.08.2010 13:47:55 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl debug FEIN: new=[#B], suspected=[], leaving=[], new view: [#A|2] [#A, #C, #B] 19.08.2010 13:48:01 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl debug FEIN: #A: blocking for 10000ms 19.08.2010 13:48:06 org.jgroups.logging.JDKLogImpl warn WARNUNG: #A: GMS flush by coordinator failed ... My solution (that works in my environment, but I can't overlook if it's correct): Changes to org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.FLUSH // 1. set the OOB flag for the ABORT_FLUSH message 552 private void rejectFlush(Collection<? extends Address> participants, long viewId) { 553 for (Address flushMember : participants) { 554 Message reject = new Message(flushMember, localAddress, null); 555! reject.setFlag(Message.OOB); // 2. the processing of the ABORT_FLUSH message has at least to set "isBlockingFlushDown = false" // but I copied the complete implementation from the "onStopFlush" method 336 public Object up(Event evt) { ... 368 case FlushHeader.ABORT_FLUSH: ... 379! synchronized (sharedLock) { 380! flushCompletedMap.clear(); 381! flushNotCompletedMap.clear(); 382! flushMembers.clear(); 383! suspected.clear(); 384! flushCoordinator = null; 385! flushCompleted = false; 386! } 387! blockMutex.lock(); 388! try { 389! isBlockingFlushDown = false; 390! notBlockedDown.signalAll(); 391! } finally { 392! blockMutex.unlock(); 393! } 394! flushInProgress.set(false);