[
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Brian Stansberry reassigned JBAS-8411:
--------------------------------------
Assignee: John Bailey
Assigning to you John, not so much to do anything about it; more to get your input on
whether this is an actual problem.
For sure, any interface referenced in domain.xml (i.e. in a subsystem) needs to be
declared in domain.xml. And any interface declared in domain.xml that is used in the
profile run by a server on a host needs to be fully specified. Other requirements beyond
that are more debatable; i.e. what's a good mix of user friendly flexibility and user
friendly understandable rules.
Interface specified at host level but not at domain is accepted
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8411
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8411
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Domain Management
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: John Bailey
Fix For: 7.0.0.M1
The current build/src/main/resources/domain/configuration/host.xml includes the
declaration of an <interface name="public" at the host level and that
interface is not declared in the domain. It's used in the
<domain-controller><local> element but I think it should be required to be
declared there. Interfaces directly under host should be used to clarify the host-specific
IP address mapping for stuff declared in domain.xml. If the address name is only used in
the DC config, then declare it there.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira