[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-2096) AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock when failing removing rule from the package
1:01 p.m.
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock when failing
removing rule from the package
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-2096
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2096
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 4.0.7
Environment: N/A
Reporter: Steinar Haugen
Assignee: Mark Proctor
This issue is copy of
https://jira.jboss.org:8443/jira/browse/JBRULES-603
Original text:
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) locks the working memories before removing the
rule from the package. However the actual operation of removing rules can fail with an
exception which leaves the unlock operation bypassed. This will lock up all the working
memories from that point on.
The original issue has status "Resolved", but the fix has apparantly been rolled
back. At least it is present in Drools version 4.0.7.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
1:03 p.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-2096) AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock when failing removing rule from the package
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2096?page=com.atlassian.jira.p...
]
Steinar Haugen updated JBRULES-2096:
------------------------------------
Workaround Description: Perform lock / unlock manually (encapsulated in a try /
finally block) when running RuleBase.removeRule(..). (was: Perform lock / unlock
manually when running RuleBase.removeRule(..))
Description:
This issue is copy of
https://jira.jboss.org:8443/jira/browse/JBRULES-603
Original text:
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) locks the working memories before removing the
rule from the package. However the actual operation of removing rules can fail with an
exception which leaves the unlock operation bypassed. This will lock up all the working
memories from that point on.
The original issue has status "Resolved", but the fix has apparantly been rolled
back. At least it is present in Drools version 4.0.7 (i.e. not encapsulated in try /
finally).
was:
This issue is copy of
https://jira.jboss.org:8443/jira/browse/JBRULES-603
Original text:
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) locks the working memories before removing the
rule from the package. However the actual operation of removing rules can fail with an
exception which leaves the unlock operation bypassed. This will lock up all the working
memories from that point on.
The original issue has status "Resolved", but the fix has apparantly been rolled
back. At least it is present in Drools version 4.0.7.
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock
when failing removing rule from the package
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-2096
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2096
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 4.0.7
Environment: N/A
Reporter: Steinar Haugen
Assignee: Mark Proctor
This issue is copy of
https://jira.jboss.org:8443/jira/browse/JBRULES-603
Original text:
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) locks the working memories before removing
the rule from the package. However the actual operation of removing rules can fail with an
exception which leaves the unlock operation bypassed. This will lock up all the working
memories from that point on.
The original issue has status "Resolved", but the fix has apparantly been
rolled back. At least it is present in Drools version 4.0.7 (i.e. not encapsulated in try
/ finally).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12:44 a.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-2096) AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock when failing removing rule from the package
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2096?page=com.atlassian.jira.p...
]
Mark Proctor updated JBRULES-2096:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.1.0.M2
Assignee: Edson Tirelli (was: Mark Proctor)
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock
when failing removing rule from the package
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-2096
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2096
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 4.0.7
Environment: N/A
Reporter: Steinar Haugen
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.1.0.M2
This issue is copy of
https://jira.jboss.org:8443/jira/browse/JBRULES-603
Original text:
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) locks the working memories before removing
the rule from the package. However the actual operation of removing rules can fail with an
exception which leaves the unlock operation bypassed. This will lock up all the working
memories from that point on.
The original issue has status "Resolved", but the fix has apparantly been
rolled back. At least it is present in Drools version 4.0.7 (i.e. not encapsulated in try
/ finally).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:32 p.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-2096) AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock when failing removing rule from the package
[
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Edson Tirelli updated JBRULES-2096:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.1.0.CR1
(was: 5.1.0.M2)
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock
when failing removing rule from the package
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-2096
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2096
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 4.0.7
Environment: N/A
Reporter: Steinar Haugen
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.1.0.CR1
This issue is copy of
https://jira.jboss.org:8443/jira/browse/JBRULES-603
Original text:
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) locks the working memories before removing
the rule from the package. However the actual operation of removing rules can fail with an
exception which leaves the unlock operation bypassed. This will lock up all the working
memories from that point on.
The original issue has status "Resolved", but the fix has apparantly been
rolled back. At least it is present in Drools version 4.0.7 (i.e. not encapsulated in try
/ finally).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
5:10 p.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBRULES-2096) AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock when failing removing rule from the package
[
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Mark Proctor closed JBRULES-2096.
---------------------------------
Assignee: Mark Proctor (was: Edson Tirelli)
Resolution: Out of Date
I checked the code, the finally does call unlock, so I think this is ok now:
{code}
public void removeRule(final String packageName,
final String ruleName) {
try {
lock();
final Package pkg = this.pkgs.get( packageName );
if ( pkg == null ) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException( "Package name '" +
packageName + "' does not exist for this Rule Base." );
}
final Rule rule = pkg.getRule( ruleName );
if ( rule == null ) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException( "Rule name '" + ruleName
+ "' does not exist in the Package '" + packageName + "'."
);
}
this.removalsSinceLock++;
removeRule( pkg,
rule );
pkg.removeRule( rule );
if ( this.reloadPackageCompilationData == null ) {
this.reloadPackageCompilationData = new ReloadPackageCompilationData();
}
this.reloadPackageCompilationData.addDialectDatas(
pkg.getDialectRuntimeRegistry() );
} finally {
unlock();
}
}
{code}
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) does not release the lock
when failing removing rule from the package
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-2096
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2096
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 4.0.7
Environment: N/A
Reporter: Steinar Haugen
Assignee: Mark Proctor
Fix For: 5.1.0.CR1
This issue is copy of
https://jira.jboss.org:8443/jira/browse/JBRULES-603
Original text:
AbstractRuleBase.removeRule(String, String) locks the working memories before removing
the rule from the package. However the actual operation of removing rules can fail with an
exception which leaves the unlock operation bypassed. This will lock up all the working
memories from that point on.
The original issue has status "Resolved", but the fix has apparantly been
rolled back. At least it is present in Drools version 4.0.7 (i.e. not encapsulated in try
/ finally).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
5269
days inactive
5695
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Edson Tirelli (JIRA) -
Mark Proctor (JIRA)
-
Steinar Haugen (JIRA)