[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1849?page=comments#action_1241... ]
Sohil Shah commented on JBPORTAL-1849:
--------------------------------------
Guy-
I agree with both your points. However, JBoss Portal does not drive the design decisions
of SSO Frameworks. Every SSO Framework has its own architecture, and JBoss Portal takes
the approach of integrating with most widely adopted open frameworks out there
With CAS and JOSSO, although you get point #1I don't believe hot swapping Identity
Connectors is supported. This is kind of the bane of old Hub and Spoke Frameworks.
JBoss SSO on the other hand is completely authentication agnostic. There is no redirect to
a Hub and back architecture. It only serves as a Cross Domain SSO Session orchestrator in
a nutshell.
OpenSSO has a hub and spoke model but not sure if Identity Connector is swappable based on
client.
In short, JBoss Portal takes the approach of integrating with whatever architecture the
Framework dictates
Make the CAS and JOSSO integrations location independent
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBPORTAL-1849
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1849
Project: JBoss Portal
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Portal Identity
Affects Versions: Identity-1.0.0, 2.6.2 Final, 2.6.3 Final
Reporter: Sohil Shah
Assigned To: Sohil Shah
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.6.5 Final
Current integration uses Mbean services for integration requiring the CAS and JOSSO
server to be co-located in the same AS as the portal server.
Make this integration such that CAS/JOSSO servers can be deployed on completely different
machines, even physically
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira