[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-175?page=comments#action_12344586 ] Tom Fennelly commented on JBESB-175: ------------------------------------ Well, I'd have thought that if we were doing Javadoc we should be putting in the package.html into each package so at least a package description appears in the top level Javadoc page (the index). It can be zapped if you're not interested in that. Actually, if my memory serves me correctly - checkstyle/sub-coding-standards might even complain re the absense of this file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-175?page=all ] Tom Fennelly closed JBESB-175. ------------------------------ Resolution: Done "We generate javadoc separately" - what does that mean? We're not using the javadoc tool?? Anyway, it's deleted from SVN so all packages are now without a package level title and description again :-) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-175?page=comments#action_12344599 ] Tom Fennelly commented on JBESB-175: ------------------------------------ We're not using an important and powerful aspect of javadoc then i.e. package level details ;-( They're very easy to add and help users a lot. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira